Transplant Errors

Transplant Errors

Since 1970 the transplantation of organs has been increasing in volume in the United States. But as the number of kidney, heart, pancreas and liver transplants have increased so have the incidences of associated medical errors.

At this point, there is no official organization or governmental body to effectively monitor kidney, liver and heart transplants in a safe and healthy way. Organ transplants save lives, but in the event of substandard organs or diseased organs, the opportunity to survive organ transplantation is diminished or taken away.

Infection is a common medical error associated with organ transplant. Consider the case of a Chicago man who was infected with HIV and Hepatitis C after an organ transplant. Or the case of a 15-year-old, Illinois boy who was infected with bacterial meningitis after receiving a kidney transplant. Because this boy’s new kidney came from his parent, the bacteria could have only been transmitted by the medical team involved with the organ. In both cases the transplant would have been successful if the medical practitioners had exercised more care when handling the organ.

In yet another reported Illinois case, a Chicago man died after receiving a new heart that was so badly diseased that this man had little or no chance to survive. Doctors later admitted that he would have been better off if they left his original heart in place and had not started the complex and risky surgeries involved in the transplant. Again, this is a case of poor monitoring by the medical staff. There is no excuse for such blatant inattention to detail when lives are on the line.

Transplant recipients should be able to receive healthy organs and without worrying about substandard and diseased organs. In many cases the recipient is desperate for the organ transplantation, without which they face the reality of death in their very near future. For them organ transplantation should be a positive solution, not a negative outcome based on medical error.

Early in 2015 a Minnesota transplant malpractice case was reinstated by the state’s court appeals. The lawsuit involving a woman who received a transplanted pancreas riddled with cancer cells had been dismissed. It was alleged that the transplant physician breached the standard of care by accepting the donated organ without thoroughly screening the donor’s health records. There were many questions about the health of the donor. The recipient of the donated organs needed both a kidney and pancreas because of the advanced diabetes that she suffered from. Five months after receiving the transplants the woman, age 36, died of severe sepsis related to T-cell lymphoma 5. She was survived by her husband, her 3-year-old son and large extended family.

In 2006 this woman was diagnosed with renal disease and thus the need for the kidney transplant which was donated by her sister in 2006. She was on the waiting list for a pancreas transplant in March 2007, but just 3 weeks later the pancreas here became available. In the lawsuit that followed her death, it was alleged that the donor had not treatable meningitis, but a rare cancer that was determined by an autopsy after the donor’s death.

The malpractice in this case was that the transplant physician did not review the relevant medical records as to the donor’s death and did not confirm the cause of his death. If the correct protocol meeting the standard of care had been followed, the doctor would have been duty-bound to reject the pancreas because enough uncertainty existed as to the cause of the donor’s death to make it reasonably foreseeable that there would be great danger in accepting any of this man’s organs. It was on that basis that the Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s dismissal of the wrongful death, medical malpractice case. The question of whether or not a doctor or medical provider complies with the accepted standard of care is up to the jury, the fact finder. Quoting the Court of Appeals, it was said that “Negligence is tested by foresight, but proximate cause [of injury] is determined by hindsight.”

Robert Kreisman has served on the faculty of many law seminars in Chicago and the United States that teach trial lawyers how to successfully handle organ transplantation medical malpractice cases. With over 40 years of trial experience in organ transplantation medical malpractice Kreisman Law Offices can help you obtain the justice you deserve.

If you or a loved one has been affected by medical malpractice organ transplantation, you might have a medical claim. Please call us 24 hours a day at 312.346.0045 or toll free 800.583.8002 for a free and immediate consultation, or fill out a contact form online.

Client Reviews
“We were devastated when our 31 year-old son was killed by a negligent driver. Kreisman Law Offices did everything to help us through this very difficult time, including coming out to the house several times which was a comfort. My wife and I were extremely pleased with Mr. Kreisman’s compassion and care for this very tragic and troubling time.” C.B.
“Bob Kreisman did everything possible in handling the trial of this case. It was devastating that I traumatically lost my leg above the knee in this truck accident. However, it was not an easy case to win. His staff was so prepared for the trial that it was not surprising that the settlement offers continued to rise until we finally accepted the multi-million settlement while the jury was still deciding the case. My wife and I were delighted that we could secure our future with this settlement. We thank Mr. Kreisman and his incredible staff for working so hard for our benefit.” T.P.
“My mother died because doctors dropped the ball. I called Robert Kreisman and he immediately set up an appointment for my entire family. We met at his offices and I was very comfortable that he would do the best for my dad and my brothers. He spent hours with all of us in preparing for depositions and he hired top notch experts, all of which contributed to an incredible settlement before trial. I know that he is dedicated to his cases and particularly to the people he works for and the people who work with him. He continues to be generous in contributing annually to my mother’s memory and to make known to the public the signs and symptoms of brain tumors.” V.S.
“My dad was ignored and mistreated at the nursing home that we placed him in. It didn’t take long for us to realize that we made a big mistake, particularly after my dad developed these terrible bedsores. We transferred him as we were contacting Mr. Kreisman. He was referred to us by a lawyer we have known for a long time and respect his opinion. Mr. Kreisman and his staff worked tirelessly to resolve this case. We were fortunate to have his services and will recommend him to anyone.” T.J.