{"id":378,"date":"2010-12-28T15:42:43","date_gmt":"2010-12-28T21:42:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/chicagomedicalmalpracticeattorney-blog.lawblogger.net\/2010\/12\/28\/chicago_prosthetic_hip_replace\/"},"modified":"2019-10-17T06:12:18","modified_gmt":"2019-10-17T11:12:18","slug":"chicago_prosthetic_hip_replace","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/medical-malpractice-lawyer\/chicago_prosthetic_hip_replace\/","title":{"rendered":"Chicago Prosthetic Hip Replacement Case Not Preempted According to Court of Appeals – Bausch v. Stryker Corp."},"content":{"rendered":"

Federal preemption of medical device liability lawsuit<\/a>s has been a volatile issue in recent years, with the courts typically preempting product liability lawsuits<\/a> citing violations of individual state safety standards. However, in Bausch v. Stryker Corporation, et al.<\/em>, No. 09-3434, the issue was whether a product defect claim<\/a> citing federal safety standard violations was also preempted by that product having federal approval. While a Chicago federal district court had dismissed Ms. Bausch’s claim, that decision was recently overturned by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. That Court of Appeals decision permitted Mr. Bausch to pursue his claim in federal court.<\/p>\n

The case facts of the Bausch<\/em> medical device lawsuit<\/a> involve a hip replacement 56 year-old Margaret Bausch underwent, during which she received a Trident brand ceramic-on-ceramic hip replacement system manufactured by Stryker Corporation<\/a>. The prosthetic hip device ended up failing and required an additional surgery to have it removed.
\nThe specific type of prosthetic hip Ms. Bausch received was approved for sale in the U.S. by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)<\/a>, but was later recalled due to a failure to comply with federal standards. In her Chicago medical device lawsuit<\/a>, Bausch’s attorneys cited Stryker’s failure to comply with federal standards during the manufacturing process of its prosthetic hip devices.<\/p>\n

Continue reading<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Federal preemption of medical device liability lawsuits has been a volatile issue in recent years, with the courts typically preempting product liability lawsuits citing violations of individual state safety standards. However, in Bausch v. Stryker Corporation, et al., No. 09-3434, the issue was whether a product defect claim citing federal safety standard violations was also […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":795,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[8,16,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-378","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-medical-device-liability","category-product-liability","category-surgical-errors"],"yoast_head":"\nChicago Prosthetic Hip Replacement Case Not Preempted According to Court of Appeals - Bausch v. Stryker Corp. — Chicago Medical Malpractice Attorney Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Federal preemption of medical device liability lawsuits has been a volatile issue in recent years, with the courts typically preempting product liability\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/medical-malpractice-lawyer\/chicago_prosthetic_hip_replace\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Chicago Prosthetic Hip Replacement Case Not Preempted According to Court of Appeals - Bausch v. Stryker Corp. — Chicago Medical Malpractice Attorney Blog\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"Federal preemption of medical device liability lawsuits has been a volatile issue in recent years, with the courts typically preempting product liability\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Robert Kreisman\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Chicago Prosthetic Hip Replacement Case Not Preempted According to Court of Appeals - Bausch v. Stryker Corp. — Chicago Medical Malpractice Attorney Blog","description":"Federal preemption of medical device liability lawsuits has been a volatile issue in recent years, with the courts typically preempting product liability","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/medical-malpractice-lawyer\/chicago_prosthetic_hip_replace\/","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Chicago Prosthetic Hip Replacement Case Not Preempted According to Court of Appeals - Bausch v. Stryker Corp. — Chicago Medical Malpractice Attorney Blog","twitter_description":"Federal preemption of medical device liability lawsuits has been a volatile issue in recent years, with the courts typically preempting product liability","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Robert Kreisman","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/medical-malpractice-lawyer\/chicago_prosthetic_hip_replace\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/medical-malpractice-lawyer\/chicago_prosthetic_hip_replace\/"},"author":{"name":"Robert Kreisman","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/medical-malpractice-lawyer\/#\/schema\/person\/5b2d28415814d7b490e5cf83de4d29f9"},"headline":"Chicago Prosthetic Hip Replacement Case Not Preempted According to Court of Appeals – Bausch v. Stryker Corp.","datePublished":"2010-12-28T21:42:43+00:00","dateModified":"2019-10-17T11:12:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/medical-malpractice-lawyer\/chicago_prosthetic_hip_replace\/"},"wordCount":686,"articleSection":["Medical Device Liability","Product Liability","Surgical Errors"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/medical-malpractice-lawyer\/chicago_prosthetic_hip_replace\/","url":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/medical-malpractice-lawyer\/chicago_prosthetic_hip_replace\/","name":"Chicago Prosthetic Hip Replacement Case Not Preempted According to Court of Appeals - Bausch v. Stryker Corp. — Chicago Medical Malpractice Attorney Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/medical-malpractice-lawyer\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-12-28T21:42:43+00:00","dateModified":"2019-10-17T11:12:18+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/medical-malpractice-lawyer\/#\/schema\/person\/5b2d28415814d7b490e5cf83de4d29f9"},"description":"Federal preemption of medical device liability lawsuits has been a volatile issue in recent years, with the courts typically preempting product liability","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/medical-malpractice-lawyer\/chicago_prosthetic_hip_replace\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/medical-malpractice-lawyer\/chicago_prosthetic_hip_replace\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/medical-malpractice-lawyer\/chicago_prosthetic_hip_replace\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/medical-malpractice-lawyer\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Chicago Prosthetic Hip Replacement Case Not Preempted According to Court of Appeals – Bausch v. Stryker Corp."}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/medical-malpractice-lawyer\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/medical-malpractice-lawyer\/","name":"Chicago Medical Malpractice Attorney Blog","description":"Published by Medical Malpractice Attorney \u2014 Robert Kreisman","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/medical-malpractice-lawyer\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/medical-malpractice-lawyer\/#\/schema\/person\/5b2d28415814d7b490e5cf83de4d29f9","name":"Robert Kreisman","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/58b55a1897459940cd9ce9dd16ac900f835174ed4e07875d30af769176f577ae?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/58b55a1897459940cd9ce9dd16ac900f835174ed4e07875d30af769176f577ae?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/58b55a1897459940cd9ce9dd16ac900f835174ed4e07875d30af769176f577ae?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Robert Kreisman"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/"]}]}},"yoast":{"focuskw":"","title":"","metadesc":"","linkdex":"","metakeywords":"","meta-robots-noindex":"","meta-robots-nofollow":"","meta-robots-adv":"","canonical":"","redirect":"","opengraph-title":"","opengraph-description":"","opengraph-image":"","twitter-title":"","twitter-description":"","twitter-image":""},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7HE1v-66","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/medical-malpractice-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/378","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/medical-malpractice-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/medical-malpractice-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/medical-malpractice-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/795"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/medical-malpractice-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=378"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/medical-malpractice-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/378\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4922,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/medical-malpractice-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/378\/revisions\/4922"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/medical-malpractice-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=378"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/medical-malpractice-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=378"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/medical-malpractice-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=378"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}