{"id":7502,"date":"2019-11-01T10:00:25","date_gmt":"2019-11-01T10:00:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/?p=7502"},"modified":"2021-02-08T16:27:31","modified_gmt":"2021-02-08T16:27:31","slug":"u-s-district-court-denies-motion-for-summary-judgment-in-restrictive-covenant-lawsuit-relating-to-final-payment-of-11-million","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/u-s-district-court-denies-motion-for-summary-judgment-in-restrictive-covenant-lawsuit-relating-to-final-payment-of-11-million\/","title":{"rendered":"U.S. District Court Denies Motion for Summary Judgment in Restrictive Covenant Lawsuit Relating to Final Payment of $11 Million"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The issue in this case was whether there was a material breach under Illinois contract law as to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.amguardholdings.com\">American Guardian Holdings<\/a> or AGH. AGH claimed it was excused from having to pay the final installments totaling $11 million for Steven Freedman\u2019s shares in AGH because it was alleged that Freedman breached restrictive covenants in a settlement agreement.<\/p>\n<p>When AGH agreed to redeem Freedman\u2019s shares in AGH, it insisted on non-competition, non-solicitation and non-interference covenants to block Freedman, his son Max and any of their businesses from competing against AGH in selling \u201cvehicle service contracts\u201d or \u201cextended warranties\u201d through auto dealers.<\/p>\n<p>Freedman\u2019s other businesses included a brokerage that provided policies to owners of recreational vehicles, plus a personal-and-commercial-lines insurance agency called American Integrity Insurance Solutions, or AIIS, which was run by Freedman\u2019s son, Max.<\/p>\n<p> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/u-s-district-court-denies-motion-for-summary-judgment-in-restrictive-covenant-lawsuit-relating-to-final-payment-of-11-million\/#more-7502\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The issue in this case was whether there was a material breach under Illinois contract law as to American Guardian Holdings or AGH. AGH claimed it was excused from having to pay the final installments totaling $11 million for Steven Freedman\u2019s shares in AGH because it was alleged that Freedman breached restrictive covenants in a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":795,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[41,49,170],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7502","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breach-of-contract","category-business-litigation","category-noncompete-contracts"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>U.S. District Court Denies Motion for Summary Judgment in Restrictive Covenant Lawsuit Relating to Final Payment of $11 Million &#8212; Chicago Injury Lawyer Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The issue in this case was whether there was a material breach under Illinois contract law as to American Guardian Holdings or AGH. AGH claimed it was\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/u-s-district-court-denies-motion-for-summary-judgment-in-restrictive-covenant-lawsuit-relating-to-final-payment-of-11-million\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"U.S. District Court Denies Motion for Summary Judgment in Restrictive Covenant Lawsuit Relating to Final Payment of $11 Million &#8212; Chicago Injury Lawyer Blog\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"The issue in this case was whether there was a material breach under Illinois contract law as to American Guardian Holdings or AGH. AGH claimed it was\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Robert Kreisman\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"U.S. District Court Denies Motion for Summary Judgment in Restrictive Covenant Lawsuit Relating to Final Payment of $11 Million &#8212; Chicago Injury Lawyer Blog","description":"The issue in this case was whether there was a material breach under Illinois contract law as to American Guardian Holdings or AGH. AGH claimed it was","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/u-s-district-court-denies-motion-for-summary-judgment-in-restrictive-covenant-lawsuit-relating-to-final-payment-of-11-million\/","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"U.S. District Court Denies Motion for Summary Judgment in Restrictive Covenant Lawsuit Relating to Final Payment of $11 Million &#8212; Chicago Injury Lawyer Blog","twitter_description":"The issue in this case was whether there was a material breach under Illinois contract law as to American Guardian Holdings or AGH. AGH claimed it was","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Robert Kreisman","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/u-s-district-court-denies-motion-for-summary-judgment-in-restrictive-covenant-lawsuit-relating-to-final-payment-of-11-million\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/u-s-district-court-denies-motion-for-summary-judgment-in-restrictive-covenant-lawsuit-relating-to-final-payment-of-11-million\/"},"author":{"name":"Robert Kreisman","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/#\/schema\/person\/5e5596abf7be77fdabc788f0a78f042b"},"headline":"U.S. District Court Denies Motion for Summary Judgment in Restrictive Covenant Lawsuit Relating to Final Payment of $11 Million","datePublished":"2019-11-01T10:00:25+00:00","dateModified":"2021-02-08T16:27:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/u-s-district-court-denies-motion-for-summary-judgment-in-restrictive-covenant-lawsuit-relating-to-final-payment-of-11-million\/"},"wordCount":963,"articleSection":["Breach of Contract","Business Litigation","Noncompete Contracts"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/u-s-district-court-denies-motion-for-summary-judgment-in-restrictive-covenant-lawsuit-relating-to-final-payment-of-11-million\/","url":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/u-s-district-court-denies-motion-for-summary-judgment-in-restrictive-covenant-lawsuit-relating-to-final-payment-of-11-million\/","name":"U.S. District Court Denies Motion for Summary Judgment in Restrictive Covenant Lawsuit Relating to Final Payment of $11 Million &#8212; Chicago Injury Lawyer Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-11-01T10:00:25+00:00","dateModified":"2021-02-08T16:27:31+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/#\/schema\/person\/5e5596abf7be77fdabc788f0a78f042b"},"description":"The issue in this case was whether there was a material breach under Illinois contract law as to American Guardian Holdings or AGH. AGH claimed it was","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/u-s-district-court-denies-motion-for-summary-judgment-in-restrictive-covenant-lawsuit-relating-to-final-payment-of-11-million\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/u-s-district-court-denies-motion-for-summary-judgment-in-restrictive-covenant-lawsuit-relating-to-final-payment-of-11-million\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/u-s-district-court-denies-motion-for-summary-judgment-in-restrictive-covenant-lawsuit-relating-to-final-payment-of-11-million\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"U.S. District Court Denies Motion for Summary Judgment in Restrictive Covenant Lawsuit Relating to Final Payment of $11 Million"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/","name":"Chicago Injury Lawyer Blog","description":"Published by Chicago Illinois Accident Attorney \u2014 Robert Kreisman","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/#\/schema\/person\/5e5596abf7be77fdabc788f0a78f042b","name":"Robert Kreisman","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/58b55a1897459940cd9ce9dd16ac900f835174ed4e07875d30af769176f577ae?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/58b55a1897459940cd9ce9dd16ac900f835174ed4e07875d30af769176f577ae?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/58b55a1897459940cd9ce9dd16ac900f835174ed4e07875d30af769176f577ae?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Robert Kreisman"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com"]}]}},"yoast":{"focuskw":"","title":"","metadesc":"","linkdex":"","metakeywords":"","meta-robots-noindex":"","meta-robots-nofollow":"","meta-robots-adv":"","canonical":"","redirect":"","opengraph-title":"","opengraph-description":"","opengraph-image":"","twitter-title":"","twitter-description":"","twitter-image":""},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7H0vI-1X0","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7502","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/795"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7502"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7502\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7855,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7502\/revisions\/7855"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7502"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7502"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7502"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}