{"id":5030,"date":"2015-04-20T10:00:18","date_gmt":"2015-04-20T15:00:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/injury.robertkreisman.com\/?p=5030"},"modified":"2015-04-20T07:33:27","modified_gmt":"2015-04-20T12:33:27","slug":"illinois-supreme-court-rules-that-material-misrepresentation-on-renewal-application-of-legal-malpractice-insurance-policy-would-allow-rescission-even-if-the-insured-was-innocent-of-the-misrepresentati","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/illinois-supreme-court-rules-that-material-misrepresentation-on-renewal-application-of-legal-malpractice-insurance-policy-would-allow-rescission-even-if-the-insured-was-innocent-of-the-misrepresentati\/","title":{"rendered":"Illinois Supreme Court Rules That Material Misrepresentation on Renewal Application of Legal Malpractice Insurance Policy Would Allow Rescission Even if the Insured was Innocent of the Misrepresentation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Illinois Supreme Court has reversed the Illinois Appellate Court in a case centering on an application for legal malpractice insurance. In this case, one of the partners of the law firm of Tuzzolino and Terpinas (T&amp;T) filled out a renewal form for legal malpractice with <a href=\"https:\/\/www.isbamutual.com\/\">ISBA Mutual <\/a>for himself and for the firm. In the application, he was asked whether there were any circumstances that would give rise to an unreported legal malpractice claim. The attorney who filled out the form answered \u201cno.\u201d In fact, a legal malpractice claim had already been brought against one of the firm\u2019s attorneys, Mr. Tuzzolino, but was not yet reported to the firm&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>insurer.<\/p>\n<p>The attorney who filled out the form, Mr. Terpinas, did not sign his name to the form. He claimed to have become aware of the claim against Mr. Tuzzolino about a month later and then reported the claim to ISBA Mutual.<\/p>\n<p>As ISBA was then on notice of the claim and the errant application form, it filed a lawsuit for rescission of the insurance policy in March 2009. There were cross-motions for summary judgment filed and the trial court granted ISBA\u2019s motion for summary judgment. The trial judge found that ISBA was entitled to rescission of the policy in its entirety and that it had no duty to defend Terpinas or the law firm because of the errantly completed form.<\/p>\n<p> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/illinois-supreme-court-rules-that-material-misrepresentation-on-renewal-application-of-legal-malpractice-insurance-policy-would-allow-rescission-even-if-the-insured-was-innocent-of-the-misrepresentati\/#more-5030\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Illinois Supreme Court has reversed the Illinois Appellate Court in a case centering on an application for legal malpractice insurance. In this case, one of the partners of the law firm of Tuzzolino and Terpinas (T&amp;T) filled out a renewal form for legal malpractice with ISBA Mutual for himself and for the firm. In [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":795,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[91,133,19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5030","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-appellate-procedure","category-contract-litigation","category-insurance-claims"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Illinois Supreme Court Rules That Material Misrepresentation on Renewal Application of Legal Malpractice Insurance Policy Would Allow Rescission Even if the Insured was Innocent of the Misrepresentation &#8212; Chicago Injury Lawyer Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Illinois Supreme Court has reversed the Illinois Appellate Court in a case centering on an application for legal malpractice insurance. In this case,\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/illinois-supreme-court-rules-that-material-misrepresentation-on-renewal-application-of-legal-malpractice-insurance-policy-would-allow-rescission-even-if-the-insured-was-innocent-of-the-misrepresentati\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Illinois Supreme Court Rules That Material Misrepresentation on Renewal Application of Legal Malpractice Insurance Policy Would Allow Rescission Even if the Insured was Innocent of the Misrepresentation &#8212; Chicago Injury Lawyer Blog\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"The Illinois Supreme Court has reversed the Illinois Appellate Court in a case centering on an application for legal malpractice insurance. In this case,\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Robert Kreisman\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Illinois Supreme Court Rules That Material Misrepresentation on Renewal Application of Legal Malpractice Insurance Policy Would Allow Rescission Even if the Insured was Innocent of the Misrepresentation &#8212; Chicago Injury Lawyer Blog","description":"The Illinois Supreme Court has reversed the Illinois Appellate Court in a case centering on an application for legal malpractice insurance. In this case,","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/illinois-supreme-court-rules-that-material-misrepresentation-on-renewal-application-of-legal-malpractice-insurance-policy-would-allow-rescission-even-if-the-insured-was-innocent-of-the-misrepresentati\/","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Illinois Supreme Court Rules That Material Misrepresentation on Renewal Application of Legal Malpractice Insurance Policy Would Allow Rescission Even if the Insured was Innocent of the Misrepresentation &#8212; Chicago Injury Lawyer Blog","twitter_description":"The Illinois Supreme Court has reversed the Illinois Appellate Court in a case centering on an application for legal malpractice insurance. In this case,","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Robert Kreisman","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/illinois-supreme-court-rules-that-material-misrepresentation-on-renewal-application-of-legal-malpractice-insurance-policy-would-allow-rescission-even-if-the-insured-was-innocent-of-the-misrepresentati\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/illinois-supreme-court-rules-that-material-misrepresentation-on-renewal-application-of-legal-malpractice-insurance-policy-would-allow-rescission-even-if-the-insured-was-innocent-of-the-misrepresentati\/"},"author":{"name":"Robert Kreisman","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/#\/schema\/person\/5e5596abf7be77fdabc788f0a78f042b"},"headline":"Illinois Supreme Court Rules That Material Misrepresentation on Renewal Application of Legal Malpractice Insurance Policy Would Allow Rescission Even if the Insured was Innocent of the Misrepresentation","datePublished":"2015-04-20T15:00:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/illinois-supreme-court-rules-that-material-misrepresentation-on-renewal-application-of-legal-malpractice-insurance-policy-would-allow-rescission-even-if-the-insured-was-innocent-of-the-misrepresentati\/"},"wordCount":923,"articleSection":["Appellate Procedure","Contract Litigation","Insurance Claims"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/illinois-supreme-court-rules-that-material-misrepresentation-on-renewal-application-of-legal-malpractice-insurance-policy-would-allow-rescission-even-if-the-insured-was-innocent-of-the-misrepresentati\/","url":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/illinois-supreme-court-rules-that-material-misrepresentation-on-renewal-application-of-legal-malpractice-insurance-policy-would-allow-rescission-even-if-the-insured-was-innocent-of-the-misrepresentati\/","name":"Illinois Supreme Court Rules That Material Misrepresentation on Renewal Application of Legal Malpractice Insurance Policy Would Allow Rescission Even if the Insured was Innocent of the Misrepresentation &#8212; Chicago Injury Lawyer Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/#website"},"datePublished":"2015-04-20T15:00:18+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/#\/schema\/person\/5e5596abf7be77fdabc788f0a78f042b"},"description":"The Illinois Supreme Court has reversed the Illinois Appellate Court in a case centering on an application for legal malpractice insurance. In this case,","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/illinois-supreme-court-rules-that-material-misrepresentation-on-renewal-application-of-legal-malpractice-insurance-policy-would-allow-rescission-even-if-the-insured-was-innocent-of-the-misrepresentati\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/illinois-supreme-court-rules-that-material-misrepresentation-on-renewal-application-of-legal-malpractice-insurance-policy-would-allow-rescission-even-if-the-insured-was-innocent-of-the-misrepresentati\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/illinois-supreme-court-rules-that-material-misrepresentation-on-renewal-application-of-legal-malpractice-insurance-policy-would-allow-rescission-even-if-the-insured-was-innocent-of-the-misrepresentati\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Illinois Supreme Court Rules That Material Misrepresentation on Renewal Application of Legal Malpractice Insurance Policy Would Allow Rescission Even if the Insured was Innocent of the Misrepresentation"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/","name":"Chicago Injury Lawyer Blog","description":"Published by Chicago Illinois Accident Attorney \u2014 Robert Kreisman","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/#\/schema\/person\/5e5596abf7be77fdabc788f0a78f042b","name":"Robert Kreisman","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/58b55a1897459940cd9ce9dd16ac900f835174ed4e07875d30af769176f577ae?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/58b55a1897459940cd9ce9dd16ac900f835174ed4e07875d30af769176f577ae?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/58b55a1897459940cd9ce9dd16ac900f835174ed4e07875d30af769176f577ae?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Robert Kreisman"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com"]}]}},"yoast":{"focuskw":"","title":"","metadesc":"","linkdex":"","metakeywords":"","meta-robots-noindex":"","meta-robots-nofollow":"","meta-robots-adv":"","canonical":"","redirect":"","opengraph-title":"","opengraph-description":"","opengraph-image":"","twitter-title":"","twitter-description":"","twitter-image":""},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7H0vI-1j8","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5030","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/795"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5030"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5030\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5139,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5030\/revisions\/5139"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5030"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5030"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5030"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}