{"id":4119,"date":"2014-08-22T10:00:57","date_gmt":"2014-08-22T15:00:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/injury.robertkreisman.com\/?p=4119"},"modified":"2019-10-28T10:35:03","modified_gmt":"2019-10-28T10:35:03","slug":"omission-written-final-judgment-inconsequential-invalidate-final-judgments-correction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/omission-written-final-judgment-inconsequential-invalidate-final-judgments-correction\/","title":{"rendered":"When an Omission to a Written or Final Judgment was Inconsequential, It Did Not Invalidate the Final Judgment\u2019s Correction"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Shuffle Tech made automatic card-shuffling equipment for the consumer market and particularly for casinos. In 2010, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.shuffletech.com\/allproducts.aspx\">Shuffle Tech<\/a> and Wolff Gaming, a distributor of the equipment, signed a letter of intent that expressed their mutual commitment to proceed with a draft agreement regarding product development and distribution.<\/p>\n<p>The agreement laid out a deal in which Shuffle Tech and Wolff Gaming would collaborate to develop a casino-grade shuffling machine. In return for providing financial assistance, Wolff would become the exclusive equipment distributor in the Western Hemisphere.<\/p>\n<p>The next year, but before the new equipment was developed, Shuffle Tech wrote to Wolff proposing that the companies part ways and settle all outstanding business. Several months later, Shuffle Tech filed a lawsuit in the federal court seeking a declaratory judgment that the draft agreement was not an enforceable contract, that the letter of intent was enforceable and that Wolff had broken the letter of intent agreement.<\/p>\n<p> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/omission-written-final-judgment-inconsequential-invalidate-final-judgments-correction\/#more-4119\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Shuffle Tech made automatic card-shuffling equipment for the consumer market and particularly for casinos. In 2010, Shuffle Tech and Wolff Gaming, a distributor of the equipment, signed a letter of intent that expressed their mutual commitment to proceed with a draft agreement regarding product development and distribution. The agreement laid out a deal in which [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":795,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[41,49,134,38],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4119","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breach-of-contract","category-business-litigation","category-commercial-litigation","category-federal-law"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>When an Omission to a Written or Final Judgment was Inconsequential, It Did Not Invalidate the Final Judgment\u2019s Correction &#8212; Chicago Injury Lawyer Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Shuffle Tech made automatic card-shuffling equipment for the consumer market and particularly for casinos. In 2010, Shuffle Tech and Wolff Gaming, a\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/omission-written-final-judgment-inconsequential-invalidate-final-judgments-correction\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"When an Omission to a Written or Final Judgment was Inconsequential, It Did Not Invalidate the Final Judgment\u2019s Correction &#8212; Chicago Injury Lawyer Blog\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"Shuffle Tech made automatic card-shuffling equipment for the consumer market and particularly for casinos. In 2010, Shuffle Tech and Wolff Gaming, a\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Robert Kreisman\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"When an Omission to a Written or Final Judgment was Inconsequential, It Did Not Invalidate the Final Judgment\u2019s Correction &#8212; Chicago Injury Lawyer Blog","description":"Shuffle Tech made automatic card-shuffling equipment for the consumer market and particularly for casinos. In 2010, Shuffle Tech and Wolff Gaming, a","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/omission-written-final-judgment-inconsequential-invalidate-final-judgments-correction\/","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"When an Omission to a Written or Final Judgment was Inconsequential, It Did Not Invalidate the Final Judgment\u2019s Correction &#8212; Chicago Injury Lawyer Blog","twitter_description":"Shuffle Tech made automatic card-shuffling equipment for the consumer market and particularly for casinos. In 2010, Shuffle Tech and Wolff Gaming, a","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Robert Kreisman","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/omission-written-final-judgment-inconsequential-invalidate-final-judgments-correction\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/omission-written-final-judgment-inconsequential-invalidate-final-judgments-correction\/"},"author":{"name":"Robert Kreisman","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/#\/schema\/person\/5e5596abf7be77fdabc788f0a78f042b"},"headline":"When an Omission to a Written or Final Judgment was Inconsequential, It Did Not Invalidate the Final Judgment\u2019s Correction","datePublished":"2014-08-22T15:00:57+00:00","dateModified":"2019-10-28T10:35:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/omission-written-final-judgment-inconsequential-invalidate-final-judgments-correction\/"},"wordCount":792,"articleSection":["Breach of Contract","Business Litigation","Commercial Litigation","Federal Law"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/omission-written-final-judgment-inconsequential-invalidate-final-judgments-correction\/","url":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/omission-written-final-judgment-inconsequential-invalidate-final-judgments-correction\/","name":"When an Omission to a Written or Final Judgment was Inconsequential, It Did Not Invalidate the Final Judgment\u2019s Correction &#8212; Chicago Injury Lawyer Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/#website"},"datePublished":"2014-08-22T15:00:57+00:00","dateModified":"2019-10-28T10:35:03+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/#\/schema\/person\/5e5596abf7be77fdabc788f0a78f042b"},"description":"Shuffle Tech made automatic card-shuffling equipment for the consumer market and particularly for casinos. In 2010, Shuffle Tech and Wolff Gaming, a","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/omission-written-final-judgment-inconsequential-invalidate-final-judgments-correction\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/omission-written-final-judgment-inconsequential-invalidate-final-judgments-correction\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/omission-written-final-judgment-inconsequential-invalidate-final-judgments-correction\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"When an Omission to a Written or Final Judgment was Inconsequential, It Did Not Invalidate the Final Judgment\u2019s Correction"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/","name":"Chicago Injury Lawyer Blog","description":"Published by Chicago Illinois Accident Attorney \u2014 Robert Kreisman","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/#\/schema\/person\/5e5596abf7be77fdabc788f0a78f042b","name":"Robert Kreisman","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/58b55a1897459940cd9ce9dd16ac900f835174ed4e07875d30af769176f577ae?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/58b55a1897459940cd9ce9dd16ac900f835174ed4e07875d30af769176f577ae?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/58b55a1897459940cd9ce9dd16ac900f835174ed4e07875d30af769176f577ae?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Robert Kreisman"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com"]}]}},"yoast":{"focuskw":"","title":"","metadesc":"","linkdex":"","metakeywords":"","meta-robots-noindex":"","meta-robots-nofollow":"","meta-robots-adv":"","canonical":"","redirect":"","opengraph-title":"","opengraph-description":"","opengraph-image":"","twitter-title":"","twitter-description":"","twitter-image":""},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7H0vI-14r","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4119","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/795"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4119"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4119\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7467,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4119\/revisions\/7467"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4119"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4119"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4119"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}