{"id":2039,"date":"2013-08-22T10:00:33","date_gmt":"2013-08-22T15:00:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/injury.robertkreisman.com\/?p=2039"},"modified":"2013-08-21T07:02:24","modified_gmt":"2013-08-21T12:02:24","slug":"court-reverses-summary-judgment-order-in-contract-case-where-questions-of-fact-remained","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/court-reverses-summary-judgment-order-in-contract-case-where-questions-of-fact-remained\/","title":{"rendered":"Court Reverses Summary Judgment Order in Contract Case Where Questions of Fact Remained"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;--><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Archon Construction Co. was hired by the defendant <a href=\"http:\/\/www.usshelter.com\/\">U.S. Shelter <\/a>to install a sewer system for a development, which was a small residential subdivision in Elgin.<span>\u00a0<\/span>The contract between the parties was signed on June 5, 2005 and specified the types and quantities of material to be used by Archon.<span>\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">For example, PVC piping was specified.<span>\u00a0<\/span>Any additional work beyond the original scope was, according to the contract, to be completed at an agreed upon price, time and materials.<span>\u00a0<\/span>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cityofelgin.org\/\">City of Elgin<\/a> was to review the work done by Archon within a year after completion of the work.<span>\u00a0<\/span>U.S. Shelter hired a civil engineering firm to oversee Archon\u2019s installation of the sewer system.<span>\u00a0 <\/span>This was to make sure that it met with both the contract\u2019s specifications and the City of Elgin\u2019s legal requirements.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">After Archon completed the installation, the engineering company reported that the work was done satisfactorily and complied with the contract and Elgin\u2019s requirements.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/court-reverses-summary-judgment-order-in-contract-case-where-questions-of-fact-remained\/#more-2039\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Archon Construction Co. was hired by the defendant U.S. Shelter to install a sewer system for a development, which was a small residential subdivision in Elgin.\u00a0The contract between the parties was signed on June 5, 2005 and specified the types and quantities of material to be used by Archon.\u00a0 For example, PVC piping was specified.\u00a0Any [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":795,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[49,46,77,22],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2039","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-business-litigation","category-civil-procedure","category-construction-contracts","category-illinois-civil-procedure"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Court Reverses Summary Judgment Order in Contract Case Where Questions of Fact Remained  &#8212; Chicago Injury Lawyer Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Archon Construction Co. was hired by the defendant U.S. Shelter to install a sewer system for a development, which was a small residential subdivision in\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/court-reverses-summary-judgment-order-in-contract-case-where-questions-of-fact-remained\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Court Reverses Summary Judgment Order in Contract Case Where Questions of Fact Remained  &#8212; Chicago Injury Lawyer Blog\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"Archon Construction Co. was hired by the defendant U.S. Shelter to install a sewer system for a development, which was a small residential subdivision in\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Robert Kreisman\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Court Reverses Summary Judgment Order in Contract Case Where Questions of Fact Remained  &#8212; Chicago Injury Lawyer Blog","description":"Archon Construction Co. was hired by the defendant U.S. Shelter to install a sewer system for a development, which was a small residential subdivision in","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/court-reverses-summary-judgment-order-in-contract-case-where-questions-of-fact-remained\/","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Court Reverses Summary Judgment Order in Contract Case Where Questions of Fact Remained  &#8212; Chicago Injury Lawyer Blog","twitter_description":"Archon Construction Co. was hired by the defendant U.S. Shelter to install a sewer system for a development, which was a small residential subdivision in","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Robert Kreisman","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/court-reverses-summary-judgment-order-in-contract-case-where-questions-of-fact-remained\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/court-reverses-summary-judgment-order-in-contract-case-where-questions-of-fact-remained\/"},"author":{"name":"Robert Kreisman","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/#\/schema\/person\/5e5596abf7be77fdabc788f0a78f042b"},"headline":"Court Reverses Summary Judgment Order in Contract Case Where Questions of Fact Remained","datePublished":"2013-08-22T15:00:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/court-reverses-summary-judgment-order-in-contract-case-where-questions-of-fact-remained\/"},"wordCount":791,"articleSection":["Business Litigation","Civil Procedure","Construction Contracts","Illinois Civil Procedure"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/court-reverses-summary-judgment-order-in-contract-case-where-questions-of-fact-remained\/","url":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/court-reverses-summary-judgment-order-in-contract-case-where-questions-of-fact-remained\/","name":"Court Reverses Summary Judgment Order in Contract Case Where Questions of Fact Remained &#8212; Chicago Injury Lawyer Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/#website"},"datePublished":"2013-08-22T15:00:33+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/#\/schema\/person\/5e5596abf7be77fdabc788f0a78f042b"},"description":"Archon Construction Co. was hired by the defendant U.S. Shelter to install a sewer system for a development, which was a small residential subdivision in","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/court-reverses-summary-judgment-order-in-contract-case-where-questions-of-fact-remained\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/court-reverses-summary-judgment-order-in-contract-case-where-questions-of-fact-remained\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/court-reverses-summary-judgment-order-in-contract-case-where-questions-of-fact-remained\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Court Reverses Summary Judgment Order in Contract Case Where Questions of Fact Remained"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/","name":"Chicago Injury Lawyer Blog","description":"Published by Chicago Illinois Accident Attorney \u2014 Robert Kreisman","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/#\/schema\/person\/5e5596abf7be77fdabc788f0a78f042b","name":"Robert Kreisman","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/58b55a1897459940cd9ce9dd16ac900f835174ed4e07875d30af769176f577ae?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/58b55a1897459940cd9ce9dd16ac900f835174ed4e07875d30af769176f577ae?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/58b55a1897459940cd9ce9dd16ac900f835174ed4e07875d30af769176f577ae?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Robert Kreisman"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com"]}]}},"yoast":{"focuskw":"","title":"","metadesc":"","linkdex":"","metakeywords":"","meta-robots-noindex":"","meta-robots-nofollow":"","meta-robots-adv":"","canonical":"","redirect":"","opengraph-title":"","opengraph-description":"","opengraph-image":"","twitter-title":"","twitter-description":"","twitter-image":""},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7H0vI-wT","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2039","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/795"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2039"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2039\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2073,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2039\/revisions\/2073"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2039"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2039"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertkreisman.com\/injury-lawyer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2039"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}